A Building Designed as a Catalyst for Project-Based Learning: A Case Study in America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i8.7239Keywords:
higher education, project-based learning, active learning environments, student-centered learning, classroom design, classroom typesAbstract
Higher education must adapt to a rapidly changing landscape of industries and knowledge. A university developing a new campus aims to transform education by designing its first academic building to promote active collaboration, project-based learning (PBL), and industry-relevant experiences, focusing on a student-centric approach. A well-designed facility is seen as crucial for success. The Active Learning Classroom has shown to positively impact students' perceptions of an inspiring environment, enhancing participation and idea generation (Park & Choi, 2014). PBL effectively connects academic knowledge with workplace experience (Guo et al., 2020).
A case study assessed the building's design for PBL during its first operational year. Findings evaluated the design's effectiveness and identified necessary changes. Both qualitative and quantitative data revealed limited use of collaborative spaces and technologies, as well as insufficient PBL integration in the curriculum. Recommendations include aligning faculty practices with program goals and engaging students more with available educational technologies in the learning spaces, both inside and outside the classroom.
References
Amedeo, D., & Dyck, J.A. (2003). Activity-enhancing arenas of designs: A case study of the classroom layout. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, pp. 323–343.
Ayers Saint Gross. (2019). UNT at Frisco Campus Master Plan. Retrieved from https://www.untsystem.edu/offices/strategic-infrastructure/documents/20190718_unt_frisco-final_report_sm.pdf
Ayers Saint Gross. (2019, December 5). University of North Texas Frisco Branch Campus Building One Program. [Unpublished Report]. Tempe, AZ.
Bytyqi, B. (2022). Project-based learning: A teaching approach where learning comes alive. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, pp. 775–777.
Brooks, D.C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726.
Dickler, J. (2024, April 12). Fewer students are graduating from college, but certificate programs are way up. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/12/students-earning-college-degrees-notched-steepest-decline-on-record.html
Frisco Economic Development Corporation. (2024). Key and Emerging Industries. Retrieved from https://friscoedc.com/site-selectors/key-emerging-industries#:~:text=One%20of%20the%20fastest%20growing,community%20partnerships%2C%20a%20ready%20and
Grossman, P., Pupik Dean, C.G., Kavanagh, S.S., & Herrmann, Z. (2019). Preparing teachers for project-based teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(7), 43–48.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L.S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586.
Hertzog, N.B. (2007). Transporting pedagogy: Implementing the project approach in two first-grade classrooms. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(4), 530–564.
Karna, J. (2021, November 8). What is the issue with learning online? It does not teach people how to think. eLearning Industry. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/what-is-the-issue-with-learning-online-it-does-not-teach-people-how-to-think
Kuh, G.D., & Schneider, C.G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/publication/high-impact-educational-practices-what-they-are-who-has-access-to-them-and-why-they-matter
O’Neill, M. (2009). Research case study: Design for learning spaces in higher education. Knoll Workplace Research. Retrieved from https://www.knoll.com/media/931/11/wp_LearningSpacesHigherEd.pdf
Orr, D.W. (1993). Architecture as pedagogy. Conservation Biology, 7(2), 226–228.
Park, E.L., & Choi, B.K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. High Educ, 68, 749–771. https://doi-org.libproxy.library.unt.edu/10.1007/s10734-014-9742-0
Savery, J.R., & Duffy, T.M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.
Tamim, S.R., & Grant, M.M. (2013). Definitions and uses: Case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1323
The Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2010). The rising price of inequality. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512174.pdf
The Buck Institute for Education. (2019). PBLWorks. Retrieved from https://www.pblworks.org/
Vail, J., Childers, S., Black, J., & Korkki, N. (2023, October 1–2). While institutions discuss the future of education; UNT built it! In The Society for College and University Planning (SCUP) 2023 Southern Regional Conference - Making the Impossible Possible, Houston, TX, United States.
Wolff, S.J. (2003). Design features of the physical learning environment for collaborative, project-based learning at the community college level. National Research Center for Career and Technical Education.
Wobbe, K.K., & Stoddard, E.A. (Eds.). (2023). Project-based learning in the first year: Beyond all expectations. Taylor & Francis.
