Reflective Questions: Promoting Metacognition Through Discussion Board Prompts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i8.7238Keywords:
higher education, metacognition, discussion, reflection, flipped classroom, Bloom’s taxonomyAbstract
During two semesters, a numerical methods course for mechanical engineering students at a large US southeastern university used discussion board questions to promote reflection and metacognition. The course covered eight chapters, each with a related discussion question. The students could choose to answer these questions and receive 2% extra credit for the course. This was intended to help the students who missed some of the 30 online homework assignments that comprised 15% of the final course grade. The questions were also meant to encourage the students to think deeply and creatively. The students could see other students’ responses after they posted their own. The questions ranged from making a meme, writing a nursery rhyme, and explaining a complex or easy concept. Only 64% of the total possible responses were submitted by students, and there was a small-to-medium practical but no statistical significance between the levels of participation among the high- or low-performing students. The submissions were analyzed and determined to be at the low level of Bloom’s taxonomy. They identified complex topics to inform future instruction.
References
Azevedo, R. (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 91–98.
Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company.
Clark, R.M., & Kaw, A.K. (2020). Benefits of adaptive lessons for pre-class preparation in a flipped numerical methods course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(5), 713–729.
Cochran, D., & Conklin, J. (2007). A new Bloom: Transforming learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 34(5), 22–25.
Colthorpe, K., Ogiji, J., Ainscough, L., Zimbardi, K., & Anderson, S.T. (2017). Effect of metacognitive prompts on undergraduate pharmacy students’ self-regulated learning behavior. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83, Article 6646.
Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2008). Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 368–381.
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
Gilbert, P.K., & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5–18.
Goupil, L., & Kouider, S. (2019). Developing a reflective mind: From core metacognition to explicit self-reflection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 403–408.
Iordanou, K. (2022). Supporting strategic and meta-strategic development of argument skill: The role of reflection. Metacognition and Learning, 17(2), 399–425.
Kaw, A., Clark, R., Delgado, E., & Abate, N. (2019). Analyzing the use of adaptive learning in a flipped classroom for preclass learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(3), 663–678.
Lemons, G., Carberry, A., Swan, C., & Jarvin, L. (2011). The effects of service-based learning on metacognitive strategies during an engineering design task. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 1–18.
Ling, H., & Venesaar, U. (2015). Enhancing entrepreneurship education in engineering students to increase their metacognitive abilities: Analysis of student self-assessments. Engineering Economics, 26(3), 333–342.
Marra, R.M., Hacker, D.J., & Plumb, C. (2022). Metacognition and the development of self‐directed learning in a problem‐based engineering curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 137–161.
Mazumder, Q.H. (2011, March 18–19). Improvement of engagement and participation of first-year engineering students using metacognition learning tool. In Proceedings of the ASEE North Central & Illinois-Indiana Section Conference, Mt Pleasant, MI, United States.
Morton, D.A., & Colbert‐Getz, J.M. (2017). Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom’s taxonomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(2), 170–175.
Newton, P.M., Da Silva, A., & Peters, L.G. (2020). A pragmatic master list of action verbs for Bloom’s taxonomy. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 107.
Norman, E., & Furnes, B. (2016). The concept of “metaemotion”: What is there to learn from research on metacognition? Emotion Review, 8(2), 187–193.
Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2019). Metacognition in schools: What does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educational Review, 71(4), 483–500.
Rothstein, D., & Santana, L. (2011). Make just one change: Teach students to ask their own questions. Harvard Education Press.
Ryan, G.W., & Bernard, H.R. (2000). Techniques to identify themes in qualitative data. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109.
Seale, C. (2022, April 28). A critical thinking strategy for student note-taking. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/critical-thinking-strategy-student-note-taking
Spence, C.M., Siverling, E., Karlin, J., & James, E. (2023, October 18–21). Co-op based engineering education model supporting students in engineering education deserts. In Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), College Station, TX, United States.
Stratman, E., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2022, June 26–29). Impact of differently worded reflection prompts on engineering students’ metacognitive strategies. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Szafir, D., & Mutlu, B. (2013, April 27–May 2). ARTFul: Adaptive review technology for flipped learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France.
Talbert, R. (2017). Flipped learning: A guide for higher education faculty. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 1–10.
Ullah, Z., Lajis, A., Jamjoom, M., Altalhi, A., & Saleem, F. (2020). Bloom’s taxonomy: A beneficial tool for learning and assessing students’ competency levels in computer programming using empirical analysis. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1628–1640.
Ulum, Ö.G. (2016). A descriptive content analysis of the extent of Bloom’s taxonomy in the reading comprehension questions of the course book Q: Skills for Success 4 Reading and Writing. Online Submission, 21(9), 1674–1683.
Vos, H., & de Graaff, E. (2004). Developing metacognition: A basis for active learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 543–548.
Walberg, H.J. (1972). Social environment and individual learning: A test of the Bloom model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 69–73.
Walkington, C.A. (2013). Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 932–945.
Zarestky, J., Bigler, M., Brazile, M., Lopes, T., & Bangerth, W. (2022). Reflective writing supports metacognition and self-regulation in graduate computational science and engineering. Computers and Education Open, 3, Article 100085.
