Examining Structures and Practices of Affinity Group Development in Teacher Education: A Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i8.7202Keywords:
higher education, identity development, teacher education, doctoral students, mixed methods, learning communitiesAbstract
For many educators, transitioning from teacher to scholar is a journey wrought with identity-laden challenges, as students must merge an already developed professional identity with an academic researcher identity. Thus, we examined how the structures and practices of cohorts enabled or constrained affinity identity development in teacher education doctoral students from 2008-2012. Through our mixed method design, the four professional, collaborative, institutional and social themes emerged as the most important aspects for our participants (n=16). Our 2011 cohort participants most readily identified as an established cohort, and upon closer examination, they, unlike the others, had structures and practices put forth in the beginning of their doctoral program that emphasized the four emerging themes. Our findings have a meaningful impact on the support that is received and scholarly development that occurs for doctoral students.
References
Andrade, M.S. (2008). Learning communities: Examining positive outcomes. Journal of College Student Retention, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2190/E132-5X73-681Q-K188
Austin, A.E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–121. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2002.0001
Bieber, J.P., & Worley, L.K. (2006). Conceptualizing the academic life: Graduate students’ perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 1009–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778954
Boncori, I., & Smith, C. (2019). Negotiating the doctorate as an academic professional: Identity work and sensemaking through autoethnographic methods. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1561436
Brown, K. (2021). Cultivating a ‘collegial turn’ in doctoral education. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(6), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1680538
Carlone, H.B. (2012). Methodological considerations for studying identities in school science: An anthropological approach. In Identity construction and science education research (pp. 9–26). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-043-9_2
Carlone, H.B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge-and-skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20413
Ching, G.S., Hu, Y.L., & Roberts, A. (2021). The part and parcel of doctoral education: A gap analysis between the importance and satisfaction of the experience. Education Sciences, 11(9), 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090481
Choi, Y.H., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., & Ermis, G. (2021). Doctoral students’ identity development as scholars in the education sciences: Literature review and implications. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16. https://doi.org/10.28945/4687
Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L.L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.1.0040
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd Ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj0702090
Curtin, N., Malley, J., & Stewart, A.J. (2016). Mentoring the next generation of faculty: Supporting academic career aspirations among doctoral students. Research in Higher Education, 57, 714–738.
Devos, C., Boudrenghien, G., Van der Linden, N., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., Galand, B., & Klein, O. (2016). Doctoral students’ experiences leading to completion or attrition: A matter of sense, progress and distress. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0290-0
Gardner, S.K. (2007). “I heard it through the grapevine”: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 54(5), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x
Gardner, S.K. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral students. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x
Gardner, S.K. (2010). Faculty perspectives on doctoral student socialization in five disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.28945/1310
Gee, J.P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099
Girves, J., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981691
Golde, C.M. (1998). Beginning Graduate School: Explaining First-Year Doctoral Attrition. New Directions for Higher Education, 101, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.10105
Hall, L.A., & Burns, L.D. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.1.wr25486891279345
Hill, L.H., & Conceição, S.C. (2020). Program and instructional strategies supportive of doctoral students’ degree completion. Adult Learning, 31(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159519887529
Hockey, J. (2003). Practice based research degree students in art and design: Identity and adaptation. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 22(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00341
Holley, K.A. (2006). The cultural construction of interdisciplinarity: Doctoral student socialization in an interdisciplinary neuroscience program. University of Southern California.
Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Karaza, M. (2008). Retention of graduate student through learning communities. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 45(2), 54–70. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ869903.pdf
Labaree, D.F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004013
Leshem, S. (2020). Identity formations of doctoral students on the route to achieving their doctorate. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 169–186.
Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2015). Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004
Mantai, L. (2017). Feeling like a researcher: Experiences of early doctoral students in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603
Mantai, L. (2019). ‘A source of sanity’: The role of social support for doctoral candidates’ belonging and becoming. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 367. https://doi.org/10.28945/4275
McNair, L.D., Newswander, C., Bowden, D., & Borrego, M. (2011). Student and faculty interdisciplinary identities in self-managed teams. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 374–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00018.x
Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11778964
Molloy, J.C. (2005). Developmental networks: Literature review and future research. Career Development International, 10(6–7), 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430510620601
Myers, D., Singletary, J., Rogers, R., Ellor, J., & Barham, S. (2020). A synchronous online social work PhD program: Educational design and student/faculty response. In Online and Distance Social Work Education (pp. 51–71). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003016557
O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. Research Methods & Reporting, 341, 1147–1150. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4587
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Johnson, R.B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
Pennington, C.G. (2021). The transition into professorship: Beyond the three-phase approach to socialization. The Physical Educator, 78(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2021-V78-I1-10190
Roberts, L.R., Tinari, C.M., & Bandlow, R. (2019). An effective doctoral student mentor wears many hats and asks many questions. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 133. https://doi.org/10.28945/4195
Rosen, B., & Bates, A. (1967). The structure of socialization in graduate school. Sociological Inquiry, 37(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1967.tb00640.x
Smith, K. (2022). Developing a signature pedagogy for doctoral education. European Journal of Education, 57(3), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12520
Sowell, R., Allum, J., & Okahana, H. (2015). Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.
Sowell, R.S., Zhang, T., & Redd, K. (2008). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline program data from the Ph.D. Completion Project. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.
Strayhorn, T.L. (2012). College students’ sense of belonging. A key to educational success for all students. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118924-17
Sun, X., & Trent, J. (2022). Shaping a sustainable doctoral pathway: A critical analysis of reflexive mediation between structure and agency in the PhD experience. Higher Education Research & Development, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2073979
Sweitzer, V. (2009). Towards a theory of doctoral student professional identity development: A developmental networks approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0034
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 12–28. Retrieved from https://ocd.lcwu.edu.pk/cfiles/Gender%20&%20Development%20Studies/GDS-502/Thevalidityissueinmixedresearch.pdf#page=19
Tenenbaum, H., Crosby, F., & Gilner, M. (2001). Mentoring relationships in graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1804
Tinto, V. (1988). Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(4), 438–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780199
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (2nd Ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981920
Van der Linden, N., Devos, C., Boudrenghien, G., Frenay, M., Azzi, A., Klein, O., & Galand, B. (2018). Gaining insight into doctoral persistence: Development and validation of Doctorate-related Need Support and Need Satisfaction short scales. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.03.008
White, J., & Nonnamaker, J. (2008). Belonging and mattering: How science doctoral students experience community. NASPA Journal, 45(3), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.1860
Wiedman, J.C., Twale, D.J., & Stein, E.L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED457710.pdf
Wollast, R., Boudrenghien, G., Van der Linden, N., Galand, B., Roland, N., Devos, C., & Frenay, M. (2018). Who are the doctoral students who drop out? Factors associated with the rate of doctoral degree completion in universities. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(4), 143–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n4p143
Zerbe, E., Sallai, G., & Berdanier, C.G. (2023). Surviving, thriving, departing, and the hidden competencies of engineering graduate school. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(1), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20498
