Students’ Self-efficacy under the Blended Teaching Model: A Case Study of Huaihua University, China

Authors

  • Ling He Huaihua University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i6.7073

Keywords:

higher education, self-efficacy, blended teaching, economics course

Abstract

Blended teaching is a teaching mode that combines traditional face-to-face teaching and online learning. In recent years, blended teaching has been regarded as an innovative teaching method in China’s higher education, attracting extensive attention from teachers and students. In this paper, based on the characteristics of blended teaching, the self-efficacy of students from Huaihua University in economics and management is investigated under the blended teaching model. A self-efficacy scale is developed from four dimensions, and its reliability and validity are verified. The results show that students are seldom confident in learning economics, and students’ self-efficacy level is low in the blended teaching model. The average level of ability-related factors is the lowest, and most students find economics courses abstract and challenging to understand. After the individual characteristics of the respondents are differentiated, their self-efficacy has significant differences in several dimensions. Specific recommendations are made to improve the quality of teaching and learning by differentiating the needs of different students.

References

Ates, A. (2009). Review: The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. Eskisehir: Anadolu University.

Aydin, S., & Yılmaz, M. (2021). Effects of blended learning on self-efficacy in language education: A meta-analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(7), 3079–3089.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Bridgeman, A., Walker, R., Sharma, M., & Smith, L. (2015). The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, pp.1–25.

Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R.F., Tamim, R.M., & Abrami, P.C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122.

Bliuc, A.M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R.A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet & Higher Education, (4), 231–244.

Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R., Cross, J., & Moore, M.G. (2009). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, (4), 181–181.

Cash, C., & Suh, J. (2020). Impact of blended learning on college students’ self-efficacy in Mathematics. Journal of Online Learning Research, 6(3), 285–308.

Cassidy, S. (2015). Resilience building in students: The role of academic self‐efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1664–1078.

Chai, X.Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Prediction of learning satisfaction by online academic self-efficacy: The role of metacognitive moderation. Journal of Open Learning, 26(1), 18–23.

Chen, Q. (2023). A survey on college students’ professional self-efficacy. Journal of Zhengzhou Railway Vocational and Technical College, 35(2), 110–112.

Gao, W.C. (2024). Research and practice of online teaching and online-offline blended teaching - A case study of human reproduction and eugenics course. Journal of Higher Education, 10(1), 90–94.

Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. JAI, 2.

Garrison, D.R., Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Journal of Physical Therapy Education.

Goodyear, V., & Dudley, D. (2015). I am a facilitator of learning! Understanding what teachers and students do within student-centered physical education models. Quest, (3), 274–289.

Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35.

Johnson, L., Becker, S.A., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). The NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. New Media Consortium.

Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 170–179.

Lan, G.S., Guo, Q., & Lv, C.J. (2019). Intelligent education constructed by intelligent technology in the “Smart+” Era - Key points and reflections of the EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. Open Education Research, 25(3), 14.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3).

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. US Department of Education.

Morgan, V.L., & Jinks, J.L. (1994). Self-efficacy and achievement: A comparison of children beliefs from urban, suburban and rural schools. Proceedings of the 17th National Conference of The Society of Education and Scholars, pp. 216–224. The University of Southern Indiana Press.

Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., & Lent, R.W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30–38.

Nouri, J., & Eskrootchi, R. (2022). Enhancing students’ self-efficacy through blended learning: A case study of language learning courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 297–314.

Owston, R. (2017). Empowering learners through blended learning. International Journal on E-Learning, (1), 65–83.

Rasmussen, H.N., Scheier, M.F., & Greenhouse, J.B. (2009). Optimism and physical health: A meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med, 37(3), 239–256.

Schunk, D.H. (1988). Perceived self-efficacy and related social cognitive processes as predictors of student academic performance. Academic Achievement.

Wang, P. (2017). Problems and improvement methods in teaching western economics. The Silk Road Vision, (5), 1.

Wu, Z.H. (2023). Blended teaching in English based on a smart platform- A case study of English language learners with low accomplishments. China Educational Technology, (12), 121–127.

Xiong, Y. (2023). Research on the blended learning model of college English in the context of internet+ education. The Educational Review, USA, 7(9).

Zhao, J., Wang, W.J., Zhu, L., et al. (2020). Study on learning engagement and academic self-efficacy of college students. Journal of Mudanjiang Normal University (Social Sciences), (6), 7.

Zhou, X.L., & Lou, Z.Z. (2021). A study of the relationship between self-efficacy and deep learning in online learning for college students. Modern Education Management, (8), 89–96.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

He, L. (2024). Students’ Self-efficacy under the Blended Teaching Model: A Case Study of Huaihua University, China. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i6.7073

Issue

Section

Articles