College Students’ Leadership Cultivation: A Case Study of Yango University in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i3.6835Keywords:
higher education, genetic constructivism, college student leadership, cultivation modelAbstract
With the continuous economic growth, the social demand for talent has significantly changed. Cultivating leadership among college students has become one of the most critical tasks of Chinese universities. Scholars have increasingly explored and researched in this area. Yango University, located in Fuzhou, the capital of Fujian Province in China, has developed a program for cultivating college student leadership in its CEO College based on the theory of genetic constructivism. Combined with the five forces model of college student leadership, it follows the competency composition and development patterns. Based on this, a three-layer competency cultivation model of disciplinary knowledge, disciplinary thinking, and problem-solving has been constructed. Yango University has developed an innovative model for cultivating college students. It provides a valuable reference for other Chinese colleges and universities to promote the model for cultivating college student leadership.
References
Bai, Q. (2022). Thinking through knowledge: Instructional design incorporated into generative and constructive thinking. Contemporary Education Sciences, (5), 17–26.
Bai, Q., Feng, Y.M., Shen, S.S., & Li, Y. (2020). Reviewing and Reappraising: Piaget’s Genetic Constructivism and Learning Theory from His Perspective. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 38(3), 106–116.
Bai, Q., Shen, S.S., & Li, Y. (2022). Examination and Enlightenment: An Analysis of Knowledge View in the Perspective of Constructivism Theory. Modern Educational Technology, 32(8), 26–33.
Chang, T.H. (2023). Examining U.S. Higher Education’s Function in Fostering Social Justice Leadership Development among College Student Leaders of Color. Education Sciences, 13(8), 1–14.
Chen, Q., & Zhang, J.W. (1998). A Review of the Essentials of the Constructivist View of Learning. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), (41), 61–68.
Cui, R.X., & Shi, Z.Y. (2022). An Analysis of General Secretary Xi Jinping’s Discourse on Educational Values. Educational Research, 43(10), 14–25.
Jiang, S.F., & Li, S.C. (2021). “Five-in-One”: Constructing a new leadership training model for college students. Education Forum, (20), 173–176.
Jiang, T.T., & Gan, X.H. (2021). Strategies for college student leadership cultivation. Cooperative Economy & Science, (15), 88–89.
Kim, J., & Lim, Y. (2021). A study on coaching program for leadership development of university students in the DISASTER Era. Journal of Negro Education, 6(4), 27–36.
Kong, L.Z., & Lin, J. (2013). College Student Leadership Education in the United States under the Concept of “Leadership” in the Post-Industrial Era. Tsinghua Journal of Education, (5), 81–87.
Li, X.Y. (2016). The influence of college students’ organizational involvement on leadership. Higher Education Exploration, (8), 115–121.
Liu, F., & Zhang, Y.X. (2022). A review of research on college student leadership in China and abroad in the past 40 years. Journal of Sichuan College of Education, 38(3), 23–29.
Liu, H.Y., & Yang, G.X. (2021). The research on the value of cooperative learning in college student leadership cultivation. Education in Henan (Higher Education), (4), 18–19.
Liu, X., Hu, Q., Wang, H.Y., & Li, B. (2020). Research on the cultivation and evaluation strategy of college student leadership in colleges and universities for team-based learning. Education Forum, (26), 126–128.
Liu, Y. (2021). Exploring the current situation and cultivation path of college student leadership - A case study of University H. The Guide of Science & Education, (17), 179–182.
Manyibe, B.M., Manyibe, E.O., & Otiso, K.M. (2022). College student leadership development: An examination of pre-college leadership development of African students in the United States. Journal of Negro Education, 82(4), 422–432.
Miao, J.M., & Huo, G.Q. (2006). Research on the Five Forces Model of Leadership. Leadership Science, (9), 20–23.
Piaget, J. (Ed.), & Wang, X. D. (trans.). (1985). The Principles of Genetic Epistemology (p.104). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Shao, L.Q. (2015). Research on the cultivation and construction of college student leadership. Education Forum, (47), 60–61.
Sun, L.P., Ma, L.H., & Xu, G.D. (2015). Exploration of leadership cultivation model based on experiential learning theory. Journal of Chengdu University (Educational Sciences Edition), 29(07), 75–78.
Sun, Q.R. (2013). Construction of the college student leadership model. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Trade (Comprehensive Edition), 13(4), 74–77.
Wang, Z. (2022). Dilemma of cultivating college student leadership and the path of breakthrough. Leadership Science, (9), 107–111.
Xie, H.L. (2022). A study on the path of college student leadership cultivation in the context of greater ideological and political education - A case study of Qingdao Technical College. Journal of Harbin Vocational & Technical College, (2), 74–76.
Xu, P., Xiong, Z.W., & Xiong, J. (2022, November 21). Detection of Verbal output flow in college student leadership levels. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, pp. 1–13. DOI:10.13860/j.cnki.sltj.20211130-026
Yan, X.L. (2015). The integration and research of college student leadership cultivation and socialist core values education. Reform & Opening, (5), 110–112.
Yu, D.J., Luo, X.L., & Zhang, H.Y. (2015). Reflections on the cultivation of college student leadership under the dual practice model. Old Revolutionary Area Construction, (6), 52–54.
Zhang, H.M. (2011). An analysis of college student leadership cultivation mode. Modern Business Trade Industry, (17), 127–128.
Zhang, Y.M., & Li, Y. (2019). Exploring the cultivation of college student leadership in the new era. Shaanxi Education (Higher Education), (5), 64–65+67.
Zhao, W.W. (2019). Research on the theory and practice of peer supported learning for college students. Reform & Opening, (6), 106–108.