“Why Doesn’t He Care About Me?” Intercultural Misunderstandings Between Chinese Doctoral Students and Their Malaysian Supervisors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i12.7464Keywords:
higher education, intercultural doctoral supervision, international students, intercultural misunderstanding, expectancy violation theoryAbstract
Addressing intercultural misunderstandings has become crucial with the rise in students pursuing doctoral studies overseas. This study examines the factors contributing to intercultural misunderstandings and the processes by which they arise. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 Chinese doctoral students from various disciplines. Through thematic analysis, key factors leading to misunderstandings were gender, language, social culture, research culture, and communication style. Furthermore, guided by expectancy violation theory, the study develops a framework for understanding how misunderstandings arise. It enriches existing literature by examining intercultural misunderstandings in the Asian higher education context and highlights future directions for exploring strategies to mitigate them.
References
Abubakar Ibrahim, A., Dahiru Idriss, I., & Zubairu Maitma, J. (2021). Emoji’s Multi-Interpretation Effect on the Intended Emotion. In International Journal on Perceptive and Cognitive Computing (IJPCC), 7(1).
Al Makhamreh, M., & Stockley, D. (2020). Mentorship and well-being: Examining doctoral students’ lived experiences in doctoral supervision context. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0013
Almlöv, C., & Grubbström, A. (2024). ‘Challenging from the start’: novice doctoral co-supervisors’ experiences of supervision culture and practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 43(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2218805
Amzat, I.H., Mohd Ali, H., Ibrahim, M.B., Othman, A., Bin Salleh, M.J., & Alade Najimdeen, A.H. (2023). Internationalization of Higher Education, University Quality Service, and International Students’ Loyalty in Malaysia. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231210498
Anikina, Z., Goncharova, L., & Evseeva, A. (2020). Constructing academic identity in the changing Russian higher education context: Preliminary perspectives. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(5), 855–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1704690
Anttila, H., Pyhältö, K., & Tikkanen, L. (2024). Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ perceptions on supervisory support and frequency of supervision–Do they match? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2238673
Bahtilla, M. (2022). Research Supervision of International Doctoral Students: Perspectives of International Students in Two Comprehensive Universities in China. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 17. https://doi.org/10.28945/4970
Bakeer, S. (2023). Discourse Markers in Doctoral Supervision Sessions: A Multimodal Perspective. In Discourse Markers in Doctoral Supervision Sessions: A Multimodal Perspective. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003184072
Bao, J., & Feng, D. (2023). Supervisory feedback and doctoral students’ academic literacy development: The case of writing for publication. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2283727
Baydarova, I. (2023). The impact of neoliberal education on the alignment of student–supervisor expectations in Malaysia. Higher Education Research and Development, 42(3), 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2096575
Bevan, J.L., Ang, P.C., & Fearns, J.B. (2014). Being unfriended on Facebook: An application of Expectancy Violation Theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.029
Burford, J., Kier-Byfield, S., Dangeni, Henderson, E.F., & Akkad, A. (2024). Pre-application doctoral communications: A missing dimension in research on doctoral admissions. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2024.2306950
Burgoon, J.K. (2005). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory and interaction adaptation theory. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290990677
Burgoon, J.K., Bonito, J.A., Lowry, P.B., Humpherys, S.L., Moody, G.D., Gaskin, J.E., & Giboney, J.S. (2016). Application of Expectancy Violations Theory to communication with and judgments about embodied agents during a decision-making task. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.02.002
Burgoon, J.K., Hubbard, A.E., & Gudykunst, W.B. (2005, July). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory and interaction adaptation theory. Theorizing about Intercultural Communication.
Caligiuri, P., Phillips, J., Lazarova, M., Tarique, I., & Bürgi, P. (2001). The theory of met expectations applied to expatriate adjustment: The role of cross-cultural training. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190121711
Campo, S., Cameron, K.A., Brossard, D., & Frazer, M.S. (2004). Social norms and expectancy violation theories: Assessing the effectiveness of health communication campaigns. In Communication Monographs, 71(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000307498
Cavanagh, V., Hammersley, L., & Adams, M. (2022). Igniting a conversation: Indigenous intercultural doctoral supervision. Geographical Research, 60(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12481
Chien, S.C., & Li, W.Y. (2024). Perceptions of supervisors and their doctoral students regarding the problems in writing the doctoral dissertation results section. English for Specific Purposes, 76, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.06.003
Cionea, I.A., Van Gilder, B.J., Hoelscher, C.S., & Anagondahalli, D. (2019). A cross-cultural comparison of expectations in romantic relationships: India and the United States. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 12(4), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2018.1542019
Cortes, V. (2022). LEXICAL BUNDLES IN EAP. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002901-18
Dai, K., & Elliot, D.L. (2023). ‘Shi men’ as key doctoral practice: understanding international doctoral students’ learning communities and research culture in China. Oxford Review of Education, 49(5), 588–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2123309
Dai, Y., Li, H., Xie, W., & Deng, T. (2022). Power Distance Belief and Workplace Communication: The Mediating Role of Fear of Authority. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052932
Ergai, A., Peterson, S.D., Smith, S., & Zhan, G. (2023). Advancing Intercultural Communication Skills in Diverse Teams: An Intervention Program for Project-Based Engineering Courses. In Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(10).
Fehringer, C., & Cornips, L. (2019). The Use of Modal Particles in Netherlandic and Belgian Dutch Imperatives. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1470542719000072
Gjøtterud, S.M., & Ahmad, A.K. (2018). Transformative power of cross-cultural PhD supervision. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 441–456. https://doi.org/10.28945/4140
Goffman, E. (2016). The presentation of self in everyday life. In Social Theory Re-Wired: New Connections to Classical and Contemporary Perspectives: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357
Halford, W.K., Lee, S., Hiew, D.N., & van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2018). Indirect couple communication and relationship satisfaction in Chinese, Western, and Chinese-Western Intercultural Couples. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 7(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000109
Hu, Y., & Fan, W. (2011). An exploratory study on intercultural communication research contents and methods: A survey based on the international and domestic journal papers published from 2001 to 2005. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(5), 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.12.004
Hu, Y., van Veen, K., & Corda, A. (2016). ¿Empujando muy poco, felicitando demasiado? Malentendidos interculturales entre un estudiante de doctorado Chino y un supervisor Holandés. Studying Teacher Education, 12(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2015.1111204
Hu, Y., Zhao, X., & van Veen, K. (2020). Unraveling the implicit challenges in fostering independence: Supervision of Chinese doctoral students at Dutch universities. Instructional Science, 48(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09505-6
Izadi, A. (2022). Intercultural Politeness and Impoliteness: A Case of Iranian Students with Malaysian Professors. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2022.17801
Khoo, G.C. (2022). Adjusting to Slow Times and Happiness: South Koreans in Malaysia. Korea Journal, 62(4). https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2022.62.4.48
Koçak, Ö., & Puranam, P. (2024). The Power of Babel: When Misunderstanding can be Productive. Sociologica, 18(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18956
Kohout-Diaz, M. (2024). Promoting inclusive university practices: Fostering diversity and dignity in doctoral supervision. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12710
Kretschmer, D. (2024). Gender segregation in the friendship networks of Muslim youth in Germany: The role of chastity norms. Ethnic and Racial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2024.2399725
Le Poire, B.A., & Yoshimura, S.M. (1999). The effects of expectancies and actual communication on nonverbal adaptation and communication outcomes: A test of interaction adaptation theory. Communication Monographs, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376460
Lim, T.S., & Urakami, J. (2019). Cross-cultural comparison of German and Japanese mobile messenger communication. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 783. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94709-9_61
Lochmiller, C.R. (2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029–2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
Lu, X. (2024). Refining the narrative: An autoethnographic insight into academic identity construction and development in a Chinese doctoral student’s journey in the United States. System, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103425
Macagno, F. (2017). Evidence and presumptions for analyzing and detecting misunderstandings. Pragmatics & Cognition, 24(2), 263–296. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17034.mac
Mernissi, F. (2011). Beyond the Veil: MaleFemale Dynamics in Muslim Society. Saqi.
Mullen, M. (2018). What to Expect? An Exploration of International Student Experience. Grand Valley State University.
Neupane Bastola, M. (2022). Engagement and Challenges in Supervisory Feedback: Supervisors’ and Students’ Perceptions. RELC Journal, 53(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220912547
Pang, H.T., Zhou, X., & Chu, M. (2024). Cross-cultural Differences in Using Nonverbal Behaviors to Identify Indirect Replies. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 48(2), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-024-00454-z
Pearse, N. (2019, June). An illustration of deductive analysis in qualitative research. Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.34190/RM.19.006
Pinto, S. (2020). Encounters of cultures in doctoral supervision: Productive or problematic? Revista Lusofona de Educacao, 48(48), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle48.10
Pinto, S. (2021). “Everything Is So Different…”: African Students’ Voices on the Challenges of Doing a PhD at a Portuguese University. Journal of International Students, 11(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v11i4.2702
Pinto, S. (2023). International doctoral students’ perspectives on the qualities of supervisors: Expectations for intercultural supervision in Portuguese higher education. Research in Comparative and International Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999231221631
Pinto, S., & Araújo e Sá, M.H. (2020). Researching across languages and cultures: A study with doctoral students and supervisors at a Portuguese University. European Journal of Higher Education, 10(3), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1777449
Proudfoot, K. (2023). Inductive/Deductive Hybrid Thematic Analysis in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816
Redmond, M.V. (2000). Cultural distance as a mediating factor between stress and intercultural communication competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00028-0
Rheu, M., Dai, Y., Meng, J., & Peng, W. (2024). When a Chatbot Disappoints You: Expectancy Violation in Human-Chatbot Interaction in a Social Support Context. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231221669
Rodriguez, S.R., & Chornet-Roses, D. (2014). How “Family” is your host family?: An examination of student-host relationships during study abroad. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.11.004
Schulze, C., Buttelmann, D., Zhu, L., & Saalbach, H. (2022). Context-Sensitivity Influences German and Chinese Preschoolers’ Comprehension of Indirect Communication. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(10), 1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221104952
Singelis, T.M., & Brown, W.J. (1995). Culture, Self, and Collectivist Communication Linking Culture to Individual Behavior. Human Communication Research, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00351.x
Singh, K., Southcott, J., & Lyons, D. (2022). Knowledge Meals, Research Relationships, and Postqualitative Offerings: Enacting Langar (a Sikh Tradition of a Shared Meal) as Pedagogy of Doctoral Supervision. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221097223
Soratto, J., de Pires, D.E.P., & Friese, S. (2020). Thematic content analysis using ATLAS.ti software: Potentialities for researches in health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0250
Taylan, C., & Weber, L.T. (2023). “Don’t let me be misunderstood”: communication with patients from a different cultural background. In Pediatric Nephrology, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05573-7
Vähämäki, M., Saru, E., & Palmunen, L.M. (2021). Doctoral supervision as an academic practice and leader–member relationship: A critical approach to relationship dynamics. International Journal of Management Education, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100510
Verdonik, D. (2010). Between understanding and misunderstanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1364–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.007
Wang, L., & Byram, M. (2019). International doctoral students’ experience of supervision: A case study in a Chinese university. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1518405
Wu, M., & Hu, Y. (2020). Transitioning to an independent researcher: reconciling the conceptual conflicts in cross-cultural doctoral supervision. Studies in Continuing Education, 42(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1615423
Xu, L., & Hu, J. (2020). Language feedback responses, voices and identity (re)construction: Experiences of Chinese international doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(6), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1593214
Yang, Y., & MacCallum, J. (2022). Transitions Across Multi-Worlds: Experiences of Chinese International Doctoral Students in STEM Fields. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211016266
Yilmaz, S. (2020). English as a Lingua Franca for EFL contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 57, 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.03.001
Zheng, G., Cai, Y., & Zuo, B. (2024). Cultivating Global Scholars: Delving into Chinese Doctoral Students’ Integration Experiences at Finnish Universities Through an Institutional Logics Lens. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 7901–7926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01420-8
