Engaging Virtual Learners: Moving Classroom as Organization Online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i12.7461Keywords:
higher education, Classroom as Organization (CAO), online teaching, experiential learning, online experiential learningAbstract
The global shift toward online learning and remote work necessitated the transition of a highly experiential course to a virtual environment, challenging the assumption that Classroom-as-Organization (CAO), a teaching methodology designed to foster student engagement, skill development and deep learning, is limited to face-to-face (F2F) delivery. This article explores the process of adapting CAO’s interactive and immersive elements for online platforms, addressing both the challenges and opportunities presented by this transition. By reviewing the CAO literature, which predominantly focuses on F2F applications, we reflect on the complexities of translating such a dynamic pedagogy to online learning and propose potential avenues for future research on the effectiveness of CAO in virtual settings.
References
Ali, N.S., Hodson-Carlton, K., & Ryan, M. (2004). Students’ perceptions of online learning: Implications for teaching. Nurse Educator, 29(3), 111–115.
Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Media International, 41(3), 231–248.
Bradford, D.L., & LeDuc, R. (1975). One approach to the care and teaching of introductory organizational behavior. The Teaching of Organization Behavior, 1(1), 18–24.
Chiasson, K., Terras, K., & Smart, K. (2015). Faculty perceptions of moving a face-to-face course to online instruction. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(3), 231–240.
Clare, D.A. (1976). Organizational behavior, inc.: Variation on a theme. The Teaching of Organizational Behavior, 2(3), 15–20.
Cohen, A.R. (1976). Beyond simulation: Treating the classroom as an organization. Teaching of Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 13–19.
Costa, P., Graça, A.M., Santos, C., Marques-Quinteiro, P., & Rico, R. (2021). Teamworking virtually: Business as usual? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1936503.
Cotton, C.C. (1975), When is reality not enough: The realism paradox in the simulation of a hierarchical organization, Teaching of Organizational Behavior, 1(4), 25–2.
Gibson, C.B., & Cohen, S.G. (Eds.). (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. John Wiley & Sons.
Gloria, A.M., & Uttal, L. (2020). Conceptual considerations in moving from face-to-face to online teaching. International Journal on E-Learning, 19(2), 139–159.
Govindarajan, V., & Srivastava, A. (2020). What the shift to virtual learning could mean for the future of higher ed. Harvard Business Review, 31(1), 3–8.
Handke, L., Klonek, F.E., Parker, S.K., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Interactive effects of team virtuality and work design on team functioning. Small Group Research, 51(1), 3–47.
Kilcullen, M., Feitosa, J., & Salas, E. (2021). Insights from the virtual team science: Rapid deployment during COVID-19. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720821991678
Purvanova, R.K. (2014). Face-to-face versus virtual teams: What have we really learned?. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 17(1), 2.
Seaman, J.E., Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
Smart, K.L., & Cappel, J.J. (2006). Students’ perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(1), 201–219.
Thomas, D., Chappell, S., & Bright, D. (2020). Teaching Methods in Business Series: Classroom as Organization. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Zimmerman, J. (2020). Coronavirus and the great online-learning experiment. Chronicle of Higher Education, 10(3), 28.
