Enhancing Student Success in Higher Education: A Human-Centered Design Thinking Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i7.7090Keywords:
higher education, human-centered, design thinking, student success, retention, progressionAbstract
Higher education institutions increasingly recognize the need to revolutionize approaches to student success. This study employs Human-Centered Design Thinking (HCDT), addressing the challenges faced by students and developing initiatives aimed at improving retention, progression, and graduation rates. Approximately 90 undergraduate students participated in the HCDT sessions, sharing insights about their academic progress. Through a collaborative process, students innovatively designed strategies to overcome these challenges. The HCDT process produced four key themes: proper and timely advisement; courses, schedules, and majors responsive to student demand; reciprocal communication clarity within and about courses; and resource knowledge availability and access. This study features the transformative potential of HCDT in higher education, placing students at the forefront of understanding challenges and designing strategies. By embracing this human-centered approach, institutions can significantly enhance retention, progression, and graduation rates, contributing to an inclusive and supportive educational environment.
References
Berzin, S.C., & Camarena, H. (2018). Innovation from within: Redefining how nonprofits solve problems. Oxford University Press.
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(I), 31–35. Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_for_social_innovation#
Coll, J.E., & Zalaquett, C. (2007). The relationship of worldviews of advisors and students and satisfaction with advising: A case of homogenous group impact. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 9(3), 273–281.
Fountain, C. (Ed.). (2021). Academic advising as a tool for student success and educational equity. University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition. Retrieved from https://www.advisingsuccessnetwork.org/wp- content/uploads/ASN_CaseStudies_Advising.pdf
Gries, T.J. (2013). Developmental Academic Advising: A 40-Year Context. NACADA Journal, 33(1), 5–15.
Johnson, S.R., & Stage, F. (2018). Academic engagement and student success: Do high-impact practices mean higher graduation rates? The Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 753–781.
Martin, B., & Hanington, B. (2012) Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport Publishers.
Montag, T., Campo, J., Weissman, J., Walmsley, A., & Snell, A. (2012) In their own words: Best practices for advising millennial students about majors. NACADA Journal, 32(2), 26–35.
Suárez, E., & Beatty, C.C. (2022). Advising in Science Education: Critiquing Where We Have Been, Moving Toward an Equitable and Holistic Advising Approach. Science Education, 106, 1299–1317. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21745
Tudor, T.R. (2018). Fully integrating academic advising with career coaching to increase student retention, graduation rates and future job satisfaction: An industry approach. Industry and Higher Education, 32(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218759928
Wenham, K.E., Valencia-Forrester, F., & Backhaus, B. (2020). Make or Break: The Role and Support Needs of Academic Advisors in Work-Integrated Learning Courses. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(5).
Williamson, L.V., Goosen, R.A., & Gonzalez, G.F. (2014). Faculty advising to support student learning. Journal of Developmental Education, 38(1), 20–24. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24614010
Zhang, X., Gossett, C., Simpson, J., & Davis, R. (2019). Advising students for success in higher education: An all-out effort. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 21(1), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116689097
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Human-Computer Institute, Paper 41. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/hcii/41
