Identification of Prospective Physics Teacher’s Problem Solving Skills: A Study on Simple Electrical Circuits Topic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i4.6957Keywords:
higher education, problem-solving skills, incorrect answers, simple electrical circuitsAbstract
Problem-solving is one of the essential and crucial skills for physical learning. This study describes the problem-solving skills of college students taking physics education programs and their incorrect answers on simple electrical circuits topic. We used four essay questions representing the series, parallel, combined series-parallel, and double-loop electrical circuits concepts to measure their problem-solving skills. Meanwhile, for describing their problem-solving skills, we used five categories of problem-solving processes, consisting of useful description (UD), physics approach (PA), specific application of physics (SAP), mathematical procedures (MP), and logical progression (LP). Further, to identify their mistakes, we examined the general mistakes in each problem-solving process. Our analysis results suggested that the college students taking the physics education program have relatively high problem-solving skills in the UD and PA categories. Still, they have low skills in SAP and MP categories, with poor ability in the LP category. Their mistakes were mostly observed in drawing complete electrical circuits and the circuits with missing and changing components (UD category), the correlation between each physic concept, law, and principle with the simple electrical circuits topic (PA category), confusion and inconsistency to correctly determine the + or – symbols for every source of voltage and difficulty in using the Kirchoff’s second law following the loop direction. Besides, the participants also frequently used incorrect V, and I value on the problem being reviewed (SAP category), did not re-evaluate the order and completeness of their answer, as well as the logical reasoning for the obtained V and I from their problem-solving process based on the scientific and physic concepts and characteristics (LP category).
References
Arnold, M., & Millar, R. (1987). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of introductory ideas in electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 9(5), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090505
Barak, M. (2013). Impacts of learning inventive problem-solving principles: Students’ transition from systematic searching to heuristic problem solving. Instructional Science, 41(4), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9250-5
Burkholder, E.W., Miles, J.K., Layden, T.J., Wang, K.D., Fritz, A.V., & Wieman, C.E. (2020). Template for teaching and assessment of problem solving in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 10123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVPHYSEDUCRES.16.010123
Carlton, K. (1999). Teaching electric current and electrical potential. Physics Education, 34(6), 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/6/401
Ceberio, M., Almudí, J.M., & Franco, Á. (2016). Design and Application of Interactive Simulations in Problem-Solving in University-Level Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9615-7
Cohen, R., Eylon, B., & Ganiel, U. (1983). Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts. American Journal of Physics, 51(5), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.13226
De Almeida, M.J., Salvador, A., & Costa, M.M. (2014). Analogy for Drude’s free electron model to promote students’ understanding of electric circuits in lower secondary school. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020118
De Cock, M. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020117
Docktor, J.L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K.A., . . . Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130
Engelhardt, P.V., & Beichner, R.J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1614813
Gu, X., Chen, S., Zhu, W., & Lin, L. (2015). An intervention framework designed to develop the collaborative problem-solving skills of primary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9365-2
Hull, M.M., Kuo, E., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2013). Problem-solving rubrics revisited: Attending to the blending of informal conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010105
Ivanjek, L., Morris, L., Schubatzky, T., Hopf, M., Burde, J.P., Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., . . . Wilhelm, T. (2021). Development of a two-tier instrument on simple electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 20123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020123
Jiang, T., Wang, S., Wang, J., & Ma, Y. (2018). Effect of different instructional methods on students’ conceptual change regarding electrical resistance as viewed from a synthesized theoretical framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2771–2786. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90592
Karpudewan, M., Ahmad, A.N., & Chandrasegaran, A.L. (2017). Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions in Science: Strategies and Perspectives from Malaysia. Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions in Science: Strategies and Perspectives from Malaysia, pp. 1–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3437-4
Kock, Z.J., Taconis, R., Bolhuis, S., & Gravemeijer, K. (2013). Some Key Issues in Creating Inquiry-Based Instructional Practices that Aim at the Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9278-6
Kock, Z.J., Taconis, R., Bolhuis, S., & Gravemeijer, K. (2015). Creating a Culture of Inquiry in the Classroom While Fostering an Understanding of Theoretical Concepts in Direct Current Electric Circuits: A Balanced Approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9535-z
Kuk, H., & Ryu, K.S. (2022). Study on Brain Activation Characteristics in Solving Physics Problems. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 72(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.72.135
Lane, D., McGarr, O., & Nicholl, B. (2022). Unpacking secondary school technology teachers’ interpretations and experiences of teaching ‘problem-solving.’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09731-8
Lee, S., & Byun, T. (2022). Understanding high school students’ errors in solving genetic problems. International Journal of Science Education, 44(7), 1143–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2068205
Lin, J.W. (2017). A cross-grade study validating the evolutionary pathway of student mental models in electric circuits. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3099–3137. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00707a
Liu, X., Gu, J., & Xu, J. (2023). The impact of the design thinking model on pre-service teachers’ creativity self-efficacy, inventive problem-solving skills, and technology-related motivation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09809-x
Maries, A. (2023). Education sciences Helping Students Become Proficient Problem Solvers Part II: An Example from Waves.
Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2010). Surveying graduate students’ attitudes and approaches to problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020124
Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2016). Intersection of argumentation and the use of multiple representations in the context of socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1100–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1183265
Niss, M. (2018). What Is Physics Problem-Solving Competency? The Views of Arnold Sommerfeld and Enrico Fermi. Science and Education, 27(3–4), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9973-z
Park, M. (2020). Students’ Problem-Solving Strategies in Qualitative Physics questions in a Simulation-Based Formative Assessment. Proceedings of the 2020 AERA Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.3102/1569740
Peşman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002
Pol, H.J., Harskamp, E.G., Suhre, C.J.M., & Goedhart, M.J. (2008). The effect of hints and model answers in a student-controlled problem-solving program for secondary physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9110-x
Price, A., Salehi, S., Burkholder, E., Kim, C., Isava, V., Flynn, M., & Wieman, C. (2022). An accurate and practical method for assessing science and engineering problem-solving expertise. International Journal of Science Education, 44(13), 2061–2084. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2111668
Riantoni, C., Yuliati, L., Mufti, N., & Nehru, N. (2017). Problem solving approach in electrical energy and power on students as physics teacher candidates. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.8293
Ryan, Q.X., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., & Mason, A. (2016). Computer problem-solving coaches for introductory physics: Design and usability studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010105
Safadi, R., & Yerushalmi, E. (2014). Problem solving vs. troubleshooting tasks: The case of sixth-grade students studying simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1341–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9461-5
Shanta, S., & Wells, J.G. (2022). T/E design based learning: Assessing student critical thinking and problem solving abilities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09608-8
Song, Y. (2018a). Improving primary students’ collaborative problem solving competency in project-based science learning with productive failure instructional design in a seamless learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 979–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9600-3
Song, Y. (2018b). The effect of peer-leader collaboration problem-solving (PLCPS) for helping physics learning of university students in introductory physics class. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 68(9), 994–1004. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.68.994
Tsovaltzi, D., Melis, E., McLaren, B.M., Meyer, A.K., Dietrich, M., & Goguadze, G. (2010). Learning from erroneous examples: When and how do students benefit from them? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6383 LNCS, 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_24
Vázquez-Bernal, B., & Jiménez-Pérez, R. (2023). Modeling a Theoretical Construct on Pupils’ Difficulties in Problem Solving. In Science and Education (Vol. 32, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00289-w
Walsh, L.N., Howard, R.G., & Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic study of students’ problem solving approaches in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108
Wancham, K., & Tangdhanakanond, K. (2022). Effects of Feedback Types and Opportunities to Change Answers on Achievement and Ability to Solve Physics Problems. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09956-4
Yuliati, L., Riantoni, C., & Mufti, N. (2018). Problem solving skills on direct current electricity through inquiry-based learning with PhET simulations. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1149a
