Formulaic Sequences Used in Academic Writing Register
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i4.6948Keywords:
higher education, formulaic sequence, lexical bundles, AntConc, academic writingAbstract
The identification of formulaic sequences through a corpus-driven methodology is regarded as a fundamental aspect of achieving smooth linguistic expression and successful communication. The present study examined a prominent category of formulaic language known as lexical bundles. This research endeavors to examine the utilization of lexical bundles as formulaic structures in academic abstracts, introductions, and conclusions. Through the examination of 150 abstracts, introductions, and conclusions, 50 each, sourced from peer-reviewed articles within the domain of Language and Literacy, the quantity of formulaic language, specifically lexical bundles, is quantified and their pragmatic functions are analyzed. The Antconc software was utilized to produce formulaic sets consisting of two-word, three-word, four-word, and five-word lexical bundles, including a few six-word structures. Subsequently, the outcomes are juxtaposed with prior investigations in the respective field. The research indicates that lexical bundles, which are a type of formulaic language, exhibit a slightly lower frequency of usage in introductions and conclusions compared to abstracts.
References
AlHassan, L., & Wood, D. (2015). The effectiveness of focused instruction of formulaic sequences in augmenting L2 learners’ academic writing skills: A quantitative research study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 51–62.
Anthony, L. (2020). AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer software]. Waseda University.
Bestgen, Y. (2013). Inadequacy of the chi-squared test to examine vocabulary differences between corpora. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(2), 164–170.
Bestgen, Y. (2017). Beyond single-word measures: L2 writing assessment, lexical richness, and formulaic competence. A System, 69, 65–78.
Bestgen, Y. (2020). Comparing lexical bundles across corpora of different sizes: The Zipfian problem. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 27(3), 272–290.
Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S. (2014). Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 28–41.
Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275–311.
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263–286.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at ...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405.
Bybee, J.L., & Beckner, C. (2015). Usage-based theory. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford University Press.
Candarli, D. (2021). A longitudinal study of multi-word constructions in L2 academic writing: The effects of frequency and dispersion. Reading and Writing, 34(5), 1191–1223.
Casal, J.E., & Kessler, M. (2020). Form and rhetorical function of phrase-frames in promotional writing: A corpus- and genre-based analysis. System.
Chen, Y.H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30–49.
Chen, Y.H., & Baker, P. (2016). Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2, and C1. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 849–880.
Cunningham, K.J. (2017). A phraseological exploration of recent mathematics research articles through key phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25, 71.
Demir, C. (2017). Lexical collocations in English: A comparative study of native and non-native scholars of English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 75–87.
Ellis, N., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375–396.
Ellis, N.C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson, & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). Routledge.
Ellis, N.C., & Ogden, D.C. (2017). Thinking About Multiword Constructions: Usage-Based Approaches to Acquisition and Processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 604–620.
Garner, J. (2020). The cross-sectional development of verb–noun collocations as constructions in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1957, 1–27.
Garner, J., Crossley, S., & Kyle, K. (2019). N-gram measures and L2 writing proficiency. A System, 80(2), 176–187.
Garner, J., Crossley, S., & Kyle, K. (2020). Beginning and intermediate L2 writer’s use of N-grams: An association measures study. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(1), 51–74.
Garner, J.R. (2016). A phrase-frame approach to investigating phraseology in learner writing across proficiency levels. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 2(1), 31–67.
Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and lexical phrases. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications (pp. 145–160). Clarendon Press.
Granger, S. (2018). Formulaic sequences in learner corpora: Collocations and lexical bundles. In A. Siyanova-Chanturia, & A. Pellicer-Sánchez (Eds.), Understanding Formulaic Language: A Second Language Acquisition Perspective (pp. 228–247). Routledge.
Granger, S., & Bestgen, Y. (2018). Tracking L2 writers’ phraseological Development Using Collgrams: Evidence from a Longitudinal EFL Corpus. In H. Sebastian, S. Andrea, A.-L. Sabine, & D. Lisa Marie (Eds.), Corpora and Lexis (Issue 81, pp. 277–301). Brill.
Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2008). Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 27–49). John Benjamins.
Gries, S.T. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437.
Gries, S.T. (2010). Useful statistics for corpus linguistics. In A. Sánchez, & M.A. Sánchez (Eds.), A mosaic of corpus linguistics: Selected approaches.
Gries, S.T., & Ellis, N.C. (2015). Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(S1), 228–255.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21.
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2018). The academic English collocation list. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(2), 216–243.
Paquot, M. (2014, August). Cross-linguistic influence and formulaic language. EUROSLA Yearbook, 14, 240–261.
Paquot, M. (2018). Phraseological competence: A missing component in university entrance language tests? Insights from a study of EFL Learners’ use of statistical collocations. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(1), 29–43.
Paquot, M. (2019). The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research, 35(1), 121–145.
Paquot, M., & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 130–149.
Paquot, M., Naets, H., & Gries, S.T. (2019). Using syntactic co-occurrences to trace phraseological complexity development in learner writing: Verb + object structures in Longdale. Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpora, pp. 1–19.
Römer, U. (2010). Establishing the phraseological profile of a text type: The construction of meaning in academic book reviews. English Text Construction, 3(1), 95–119.
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & McClair, A. (2013). Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(3), 214–225.
Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University.
Yoon, H.J. (2016). Association strength of verb-noun combinations in experienced NS and less experienced NNS writing: Longitudinal and cross-sectional findings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 42–57.
