Distance Learning and the Application of Technology: Culture Specific Measures in Technology Based Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i4.6939Keywords:
higher education, synchronous, asynchronous,, cultural adaptability, cultural influence, technology, content deliveryAbstract
Determining the overall level of satisfaction among students who are being educated via distance learning methods and how instructional approach (synchronous versus asynchronous) varies, in terms of both knowledge outcome and level of satisfaction, is the hallmark of this study. It also considers student perception of online learning compared to face-to-face learning, and whether or not students can learn as much online as in person. Further, students can, in some cases, be more satisfied with online learning. Student success levels and satisfaction are, however, related to the level of engagement they experience and the cultural adaptability of the course work, as it relates to the online teaching methods used and the teacher’s approach to online learning. Thus, the study concludes that distance learning is an appropriate approach for students but more research is needed regarding best practices for collaboration, content delivery, and adaptability.
References
Adanan, H., Adanan, M., & Herawan, T. (2020). M-WebQuest Development: Reading Comprehension of Senior High School Students in Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(3), 74–92.
Adedoyin, O.B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 1–13.
Alnabelsi, T., Al-Hussaini, A., & Owens, D. (2015). Comparison of traditional face-to-face teaching with synchronous e-learning in otolaryngology emergencies teaching to medical undergraduates: A randomized controlled trial. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 272(3), 759–763.
Arrosagaray, M., González-Peiteado, M., Pino-Juste, M., & Rodríguez-López, B. (2019). A comparative study of Spanish adult students’ attitudes to ICT in classroom, blended and distance language learning modes. Computers & Education, 134, 31–40.
Balestrini, M., Hernandez-Leo, D., Nieves, R., & Blat, J. (2013). Technology-supported orchestration matters: Outperforming paper-based scripting in a Jigsaw classroom. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(1), 17–30.
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook: Cognitive domains. New York: David McKay.
Chen, C.M., & Chen, F.Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers & Education, 77, 67–81.
Chen, E., Kaczmarek, K., & Ohyama, H. (2020). Student perceptions of distance learning strategies during COVID‐19. Journal of Dental Education.
Chen, Y.H., Looi, C.K., Lin, C.P., Shao, Y.J., & Chan, T.W. (2012). Utilizing a collaborative cross number puzzle game to develop the computing ability of addition and subtraction. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 354–366.
Choi, K.S., & Im, I. (2015). Comparative analysis of the use of mobile microblogging and nonmobile online message board for group collaboration. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19(4), 112–135.
Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35(1), 26–58.
Constantine, M.B. (2012). A study of individual learning styles and e-learning preferences among community health aides/practitioners in rural Alaska [Doctoral dissertation, TUI University].
Damary, R., Markova, T., & Pryadilina, N. (2017). Key challenges of online education in multi-cultural context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 83–89.
Englert, C.S., Zhao, Y., Dunsmore, K., Collings, N.Y., & Wolbers, K. (2007). Scaffolding the writing of students with disabilities through procedural facilitation: Using an Internet-based technology to improve performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(1), 9–29.
Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., & Sánchez, A. (2014). Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 434–445.
Goldenberg, L., Meade, T., Cooperman, N., & Midouhas, E. (2011) Impact of a technology infused middle school writing program on sixth-grade students’ writing ability and engagement. Middle Grades Research Journal, 6(2), 75–97.
Graham, C.R., Henrie, C.R., & Gibbons, A.S. (2014). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. In A.G. Picciano, C.D. Dziuban, & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 13–33). New York, NY: Routledge.
Harned, M.S., Dimeff, L.A., Woodcock, E.A., Kelly, T., Zavertnik, J., Contreras, I., & Danner, S.M. (2014). Exposing clinicians to exposure: A randomized controlled dissemination trial of exposure therapy for anxiety disorders. Behavior Therapy, 45(6), 731–744.
Joshi, P., Thukral, A., Joshi, M., Deorari, A.K., & Vatsa, M. (2013). Comparing the Effectiveness of Webinars and Participatory learning on essential newborn care (ENBC) in the class room in terms of acquisition of knowledge and skills of student nurses: A randomized controlled trial. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 80(2), 168–170.
Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students’ Sense of Community and Perspectives of Taking Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169–179.
Lorenzo-Alvarez, R., Rudolphi-Solero, T., Ruiz-Gomez, M.J., & Sendra-Portero, F. (2019). Medical student education for abdominal radiographs in a 3D virtual classroom versus traditional classroom: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Roentgenology, 213(3), 644–650.
Moazami, F., Bahrampour, E., Azar, M.R., Jahedi, F., & Moattari, M. (2014). Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: A post-test only design study. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 1–5.
Nelson, L. (2010). Learning outcomes of webinar versus classroom instruction among baccalaureate nursing students: A randomized controlled trial [Doctoral dissertation].
Nicklen, P., Keating, J.L., Paynter, S., Storr, M., & Maloney, S. (2016). Remote-online case-based learning: A comparison of remote-online and face-to-face, case-based learning-a randomized controlled trial. Education for Health, 29(3), 195.
Olson, J.S., & McCracken, F.E. (2015). Is it worth the effort? The impact of incorporating synchronous lectures into an online course. Online Learning, 19(2).
Picciano, A.G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166–190.
Shoepe, T.C., McManus, J.F., August, S.E., Mattos, N.L., Vollucci, T.C., & Sparks, P.R. (2020). Instructor Prompts and Student Engagement in Synchronous Online Nutrition Classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(3), 194–210.
Spalla, T.L. (2012). Building the ARC in nursing education: Cross-cultural experiential learning enabled by the technology of video or web conferencing [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University].
Sung, Y.T., Yang, J.M., & Lee, H.Y. (2017). The effects of mobile-computer-supported collaborative learning: Meta-analysis and critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 768–805.
