Learning From Exploring S-STEP Literature: Making Meaning From a Systematic Review of Discipline-Focused Self-Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i8.4506Keywords:
higher education, self-study of teacher education practices, content area, meaning-making, transactional theory, teaching practices, educational responsibility, critical friend, discipline, experience, higher education faculty, systematic review, qualitative metasynthesisAbstract
Drawing from a metasynthesis (Edge & Olan, 2020), in order to explore the question, “What meanings did I make from conducting a systematic review of discipline-focused self-study literature?” this inquiry sought to better understand how content-area knowledge and practice is situated within multiple, interconnected systems shaped by power and privilege. Results include understanding and positioning literature as “critical friends,” extending a theoretical framework from the content areas to self-study research design and practice, and questioning privilege and power in exploration. Implications address how self-study of teacher education practices methodology can position higher education faculty for contributing to equity and justice.
Downloads
Published
2021-08-31
How to Cite
Edge, C. U. (2021). Learning From Exploring S-STEP Literature: Making Meaning From a Systematic Review of Discipline-Focused Self-Studies. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(8). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i8.4506
Issue
Section
Articles