A Critical Review of Executive Compensation Policies Grounded in ESG Principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v19i2.7110Keywords:
innovation, sustainability, executive compensation, ESG, incentives, shareholders, accounting and financeAbstract
High executive salaries often lead executives to prioritize short-term gains over long-term ESG benefits. This review explores how reducing executive compensation, influenced by environmental regulations, impacts innovation in sustainable technologies. As shareholders demand more ESG-focused models, the traditional compensation model is shifting to link compensation with environmental and social goals. The literature focuses on greenhouse gas emissions, employee satisfaction, and regulatory compliance. This review covers global ESG-based incentives, followed by country-specific approaches in China, France, Germany, India, Italy, South Africa, Sweden, and the United States. It concludes with alternative frameworks from financial institutions. Executives are more likely to engage in environmental initiatives when personal gains are tied to these goals. Equity-based incentives are favored over salary-based bonuses. Concepts like the parity pill aim to increase investor trust and transparency. As investors become more environmentally conscious, they expect companies to align with these values. Executives are encouraged to prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term personal gains.
References
Abudy, M.M., Gavious, I., & Shust, E. (2023). Does adopting voluntary ESG practices affect executive compensation? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101718
Ali, S., Jiang, J., Rehman, R.U., & Khan, M.K. (2023). Tournament incentives and environmental performance: The role of green innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(7), 17670–17680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23406-w
Bebchuk, L.A., & Tallarita, R. (2022). The perils and questionable promise of ESG-based compensation (Working Paper No. 671). Journal of Corporation Law.
Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40390278
Byrne, D. (n.d.). What is a two-tiered board structure? The Corporate Governance Institute. Retrieved from https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/insights/lexicon/what-is-a-two-tiered-board-structure/
Chen, L., Mao, C., & Gao, Y. (2023). Executive compensation stickiness and ESG performance: The role of digital transformation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1166080
Chen, X., Li, Y., Hu, Y., & Yu, G. (2023). The impact of general manager’s responsible leadership and executive compensation incentive on enterprise ESG performance. Sustainability, 15(15), 11883 Article 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511883
Chouaibi, Y., Rossi, M., & Zouari, G. (2021). The effect of corporate social responsibility and the executive compensation on implicit cost of equity: Evidence from French ESG data. Sustainability, 13(20), 11510. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011510
Cohen, S., Kadach, I., Ormazabal, G., & Reichelstein, S. (2023). Executive compensation tied to ESG performance: International evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(3), 805–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12481
Crichton, R., Shrivastava, P., Walker, T., Farhidi, F., Weeratunga, V., & Renwick, D. (2022). Improving executive compensation in the fossil fuel sector to influence green behaviors. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 37(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/doi/10.1177/23970022221137657
Cucari, N., D’Angelo, E., Sardanelli, D., Surace, F., & Di Silvestre, S. (2023). Substance and symbol in ESG-linked executive compensation: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 41(2), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.7433/s121.2023.06
D’Apolito, E., Iannuzzi, A.P., Labini, S.S., & Sica, E. (2019). Sustainable compensation and performance: An empirical analysis of European banks. Journal of Financial Management, Markets, and Institutions, 7(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2282717X19400048
Dikolli, S.S., Frank, M.M., Guo, Z., & Lynch, L.J. (2023). ESG mutual fund voting on executive compensation shareholder proposals. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 35(3), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.2308/JMAR-2022-036
Fabrizi, M., Mallin, C., & Michelon, G. (2014). The role of CEO’s personal incentives in driving corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1864-2
Flammer, C., Hong, B., & Minor, D. (2019). Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 40(7), 1097–1122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3018
Homroy, S., Mavruk, T., & Nguyen, V.D. (2023). ESG-linked compensation, CEO skills, and shareholder welfare. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 12(4), 939–985. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfad012
Hong, B., Li, Z., & Minor, D. (2016). Corporate governance and executive compensation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics: JBE, 136(1), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2962-0
Jang, G.-Y., Kang, H.-G., & Kim, W. (2022). Corporate executives’ incentives and ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 49, 103187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103187
Lee, J., Koh, K., & Shim, E.D. (2023). Managerial incentives for ESG in the financial services industry: Direct and indirect association between ESG and executive compensation. Managerial Finance, 50(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-03-2023-0149
Li, Q., Maqsood, U.S., & Zahid, R.M.A. (2023). Nexus between government surveillance on executive compensation and green innovation: Evidence from the type of state-owned enterprises. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12601
Li, Z., & Thibodeau, C. (2019). CSR-contingent executive compensation incentive and earnings management. Sustainability, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123421
Liu, H., Yu, X., & Peng, Y. (2022). Government subsidies and green innovation in Chinese enterprises-based on the synergy of executive incentives. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 31(3), 534–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2022.2131586
Matemane, R., Moloi, T., & Adelowotan, M. (2022). Appraising executive compensation ESG-based indicators using analytical hierarchical process and Delphi techniques. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(10), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100469
Pareek, R., & Sahu, T.N. (2023). The nonlinear effect of executive compensation on corporate social responsibility performance. Rajagiri Management Journal, 18(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-06-2022-0094
Rath, C., Kurniasari, F., & Deo, M. (2020). CEO compensation and firm performance: The role of ESG transparency. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 4(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v4i2.225
Ratti, S., Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Dell’Agostino, L. (2023). Environmental claims and executive compensation plans: Is there a link? An empirical investigation of Italian listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 422, 138434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138434
Ritz, R.A. (2022). Linking executive compensation to climate performance. California Management Review, 64(3), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221077470
Skladany, M. (2022). Rethinking executive incentives can boost ESG performance. MIT Sloan Management Review, 64(1), 1–4.
Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660–1680. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0018
Ullah, S., Khan, F.U., Cismaș, L.-M., Usman, M., & Miculescu, A. (2022). Do tournament incentives matter for CEOs to be environmentally responsible? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), Article 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010470
United Nations. (2015, December 12). The Paris Agreement. Unfccc.int. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A.S. (2023). Does aggressive environmental, social, and governance engagement trigger firm risk? The moderating role of executive compensation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 398, 136542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136542
Velte, P. (2016). Sustainable management compensation and ESG performance – The German case. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(4), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.14(4).2016.02
Wu, J., Liu, B., Zeng, Y., & Luo, H. (2022). Good for the firm, good for the society? Causal evidence of the impact of equity incentives on a firm’s green investment. International Review of Economics & Finance, 77, 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.10.013
Xiaofang, L., & Zhuohang, L. (2022). Does environmental regulation contribute to enterprise green innovation? Empirical data based on the mediation effect from the perspective of executive compensation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2116571
Zeng, Y., Zhao, X., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Equity incentives and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104592
Zhao, J., Chankoson, T., Cheng, W., & Pongtornkulpanich, A. (2023). Executive compensation incentives, innovation openness and green innovation: Evidence from China’s heavily polluting enterprises. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2023-0064
