Empowerment Evaluation’s Practice and Principle Effects on Psychological Empowerment and Self-Determination Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v24i2.7171Keywords:
organizational psychology, empowerment theory, self-determination theory, empowerment evaluation, research on evaluation, individual empowerment, collective empowerment, individual self-determination, collective self-determinationAbstract
This study contributed to a limited body of research on empowerment evaluation by examining its processes, principles, and outcomes. Objectives included: 1) determining implementation fidelity to the three empowerment evaluation models; 2) determining evidence of empowerment evaluation process principles; 3) determining whether empowerment evaluation outcome principles resulted from the evaluations reported on; and 4) determining whether variation in empowerment and self-determination was explained by the interaction between model fidelity and percentage of steps implemented, process principles in evidence, outcome principles in evidence, and evaluator characteristics. Results indicated individual empowerment and self-determination were likely outcomes of evaluations reported on; evidence of all ten empowerment evaluation principles indicated they were empowerment evaluations; evaluators adhered with fidelity to all three models, no model was privileged over another, and steps were chosen from across all three models. Empowerment and self-determination are more likely when empowerment evaluations are conducted by female evaluators living and working in an African country and SEEPPO was a successful first attempt at assessing the process and outcomes of empowerment evaluation work.
References
Anderson, J. (1996). Yes, but is it empowerment? Initiation, implementation and outcomes of community action. In B. Humphries (Ed.), Critical perspectives on empowerment (pp. 69–83). Birmingham: Venture Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.
Bandura, A., Adams, N.E., & Beyer, J. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(3), 125–139.
Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R.L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821–836.
Cousins, J.B. (2005). Will the real empowerment evaluation please stand up? In D.M. Fetterman, & A. Wandersman (eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 183–208). New York: Guilford.
Dakubo, C. (2004). Ecosystem approach to community health planning in Ghana. EcoHealth, 1, 50–59.
Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd Ed., pp. 197–213). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Reflections on emergent themes and next steps. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1999). Reflections on empowerment evaluation: Learning from experience. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, (Special Issue), 5–37.
Fetterman, D.M. (2001). Empowerment evaluation and self-determination: A practical approach toward program improvement and capacity building. In N. Schneiderman, & M.A. Speers (eds.), Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health (pp. 321–350). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Fetterman, D.M. (2004). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. In D.M. Fetterman, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 27–41). New York: Guilford.
Fetterman, D.M., & Wandersman, A. (eds.). (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Goodman, R.M. (2000). Bridging the gap in effective program implementation. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 309–321.
Goodman, R.M. (2001). Evaluation of community-based health programs: An alternative perspective. In N. Schneiderman (Ed.), Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health (pp. 293–304). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gore, J. (1992). What we can do for you! What can “we” do for “you?”: Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In C. Luke, & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 54–73). New York: Routledge.
Granello, D.H., & Wheaton, J.E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82(4), 387–393.
Green, L.W., George, M.A., Daniel, M., Frankish, C.J., Herbert, C.J., & Bowie, W.R. (1995). Study of participatory research in health promotion. Vancouver, BC: Royal Society of Canada, University of British Columbia.
Israel, B.A., Checkoway, B., Schulz, A., & Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 149–170.
Koestner, R., Ryan, R.M., Bernieri, F., & Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality, 52, 233–248.
Lennie, J. (2002). Rural women’s empowerment in a communication technology project: Some contradictory effects. Rural Society, 12(3), 224–245.
Lennie, J. (2005). An evaluation capacity-building process for sustainable community IT initiatives: Empowering and disempowering impacts. Evaluation, 11(4), 390–414.
Lennie, J., Hatcher, C., & Morgan, M. (2003). Feminist discourses of (dis)empowerment in an action research project involving rural women and communication technologies. Action Research, 1(1), 57–80.
Levin, H.M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation and accelerated schools. In D. Fetterman, S.J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 49–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Macaulay, A.C., & Nutting, P.A. (2006). Moving the frontiers forward: Incorporating community-based participatory research into practice-based research networks. Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 4–7.
Miller, R.L. (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice, reviewed by Robin Lin Miller. In D.M. Fetterman, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(3), 317–319.
Miller, R.L., & Campbell, R. (2006). Taking stock of empowerment evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(3), 296–319.
Nederhof, A.J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263–280.
Patton, M.Q. (2005). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context: Take two. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 408–414.
Perry, P.D., & Backus, C.A. (1995). A different perspective on empowerment in evaluation: Benefits and risks to the evaluation process. Evaluation Practice, 16(1), 37–46.
Power, G., Maury, M., & Maury, S. (2002). Operationalising bottom-up learning in international NGOs: Barriers and alternatives. Development in Practice, 12(3 & 4), 272–284.
Scriven, M. (1997a). Empowerment evaluation examined: Review of empowerment evaluation knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability. Evaluation Practice, 18(2), 165–175.
Sechrest, L.E. (1997). Review of empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Environment and Behavior, 29(3), 422–426.
Smith, N.L. (1999). A framework for characterizing the practice of evaluation, with application to empowerment evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, (Special Issue), 39–68.
Smith, N.L. (2007). Empowerment evaluation as evaluation ideology. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(2), 169–178.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go, and where it needs to go. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 321–338.
Sudman, S., & Blair, E. (1999). Sampling in the twenty-first century. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 269–277.
Vanderplaat, M. (1995). Beyond technique: Issues in evaluating for empowerment. Evaluation, 1(1), 81–96.
Vanderslice, V. (1984). Empowerment: A definition in progress. Human Ecology Forum, 14(1), 2–3.
Wandersman, A., Snell-Johns, J., Lentz, B., Fetterman, D.M., Keener, D., Livet, M., . . . Flaspohler, P. (2005). The principles of empowerment evaluation. In D.M. Fetterman, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 27–41). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Worthington, C. (1999). Empowerment evaluation: Understanding the theory behind the framework. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 14(1), 1–28.
Zimmerman, M.A., Israel, B.A., Schulz, A., & Checkoway, B. (1992). Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20(6), 707–727.
