Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS): A Regional Integration Analysis

Authors

  • Samuel K. Andoh Southern Connecticut State University
  • James Thorson Southern Connecticut State University
  • Yilma Gebremariam Southern Connecticut State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v21i2.7063

Keywords:

leadership, accountability, ethics, international trade, trade agreements, trade, integration, economic growth

Abstract

In 1975, the 15 countries that comprise the Economic Community of West Africa States (ECOWAS) formalized a trade agreement to integrate their economies to make it easier for them to trade with each other and thus promote economic growth and development. Since then, the evidence suggests that intra-regional trade has not changed much. In this paper, we examine the factors hindering trade using data from 2000, 2010, and 2020 and a modified version of the gravity equation. The results of our study suggest that economic factors are primarily responsible for intra-ECOWAS trade and that policies designed to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce administrative barriers could significantly improve intra-ECOWAS trade.

References

Anderson, J.E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.

Aryeetey, E. (2001, March). Regional integration in West Africa. OECD Working Paper #170, CD/DOC (2001) 2.

Balassa, B. (1978). Exports and economic growth: Further evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 5, 181–191.

Chaney, T. (2013). The gravity equation in international Trade: An explanation. NBER Working Paper #19285.

Van Bergeijk, P.A.G., & Brakman, S. (2010). The comeback of the gravity model. In P.A.G. Van Bergeijk, & S. Brakman (Eds.), The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications. Cambridge University Press.

Bergstrand, J.H. (1985, August). The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–481.

Dada, E., & Adeleke, A. (2015). An empirical analysis of integration and intra-regional trade in ECOWAS. Journal of African Development, 17(1), 95–116

Evenett, S.J. (2002). On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 281–316.

Frankel, J.J., & Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth. The American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399.

Ibok, S., & Atayero, A. (2022). ECOWAS and the challenges to regional integration in West Africa. In S. Folarin, E. Akinlabi, & A. Atayero (Eds.), The United Nations and Sustainable Development Goals. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95971-5_10

Isard, W. (1954, May). Location theory and trade theory: Short-run analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68(2), 305–320. doi: 10.2307/1884452. JSTOR 1884452

Keesing, D.B., & Sherk, D.R. (1971, December). Population density in patterns of trade and development. The American Economic Review, 61(5), 956–961.

Martinez-Zarzoso, I., & Nowak-Lehmann, F. (2003). Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur-European Union Trade Flows. Journal of Applied Economics, 6(2), 291–316, DOI:10.1080/15140326.2003.12040596

Munim, Z.H., & Schramm, H.-J. (2018). The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: The mediating role of Seaborne Trade. Journal of Shipping and Trade, Article 1. DOI: 10.1186/s41072-018-0027-0

Songwe, V. (2018). Intra-African trade: A path to economic diversification and inclusion. In Boosting Trade and Investment: An Agenda for Regional and International Engagement (pp. 96–16).

Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy.

Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K.H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 187–231.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-25

How to Cite

Andoh, S. K., Thorson, J., & Gebremariam, Y. (2024). Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS): A Regional Integration Analysis. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v21i2.7063

Issue

Section

Articles