Influential Article Review - Politics and CRS: Examining a Unique Relationship

Authors

  • Audrey Cobb
  • Krista Ball
  • Alton Holland

Keywords:

Political connection, Corporate social responsibility, Stakeholder salience theory

Abstract

This paper examines corporate social responsibility. We present insights from a highly influential paper. Here are the highlights from this paper: In recent years, Chinese private companies have improved a lot in corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance, especially in the philanthropic area. However, private companies’ awareness and performance of social responsibility still have a big disparity with SOEs. And private companies’ policy of social responsibility is subjective and preferential. To explain this contradiction, this paper tries to introduce political connection and, based on stakeholder salience theory, to test how political connection changes managers’ perception of stakeholders’ relative importance and cause changes in stakeholders’ satisfaction level of social responsibility requirement. The result shows that (1) political connection has positive influence on private companies’ CSR; (2) companies with political connection are significantly better than the ones without political connection in society-oriented and customers-oriented responsibility; (3) two kinds of companies have no significant difference in investors-oriented responsibility; (4) as for government-oriented and employee-oriented responsibility, companies with political connection are worse than ones without political connection. These findings are significant for China’s future construction of competition systems and private companies’ choice of stakeholders and future investment. For our overseas readers, we then present the insights from this paper in Spanish, French, Portuguese, and German.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-12

How to Cite

Cobb, A., Ball, K., & Holland, A. (2019). Influential Article Review - Politics and CRS: Examining a Unique Relationship. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 16(6). Retrieved from https://mail.articlegateway.com/index.php/JLAE/article/view/3414

Issue

Section

Articles