An Empirical Assessment of IAS 40 Investment Property

Abstract

This study examines the value relevance of the fair value model versus the cost model for evaluating investment properties under IAS 40 Investment Property. Contrary to the popular belief that fair value is the most relevant measurement attribute, we find that the coefficient estimate of investment properties for Chinese companies that adopted IAS 40’s fair value model is significantly smaller than its theoretical value, and is not significantly different from zero, suggesting that reported fair values are not value relevant as perceived by investors for the sample firms. Furthermore, investors tend to adjust the valuation of fair value companies’ non-investment property assets downward. The findings do not support the claim that fair value is superior to historical cost for the investment property valuation. Our findings highlight the need for more implementation guidelines from the IASB to enhance the value relevance of fair value estimates under IAS 40.