Emotional Wellbeing: Understanding the Role of Entrepreneurs in AI-Enabled Machines

Authors

  • Amy Gresock University of Pittsburgh at Bradford
  • Kira Leck University of Pittsburgh at Bradford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v26i6.7422

Keywords:

business, economics, entrepreneurship, artificial intelligence, parasocial relationship, anthropomorphization

Abstract

Artificial intelligence applications are more pervasive than ever, and users trust AI-enabled machines (AIEMs) for many tasks. However, the improper design and use of AIEMs may threaten individuals' ability to shape their lives and make their own decisions. This may be especially true with AIEMs designed with a high degree of humanlike features, which contribute to processes of anthropomorphization. This can encourage a parasocial relationship by the user, which fosters trust and increased usage of the device. Since AIEMs may nudge user behavior, entrepreneurs must consider the psychological aspects of relationship building when creating these devices.

References

Adam, A. (2013). Parasocial romance: A social exchange perspective. Interpersona, 7(1), 12–25.

Aw, E.C., Tan, G.W., Cham, T., Raman, R., & Ooi, K. (2022). Alexa, what’s on my shopping list? Transforming customer experience with digital voice assistants. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121711.

Barden, R.C., Garber, J., Leiman, B., Ford, M.E., & Masters, J.C. (1985). Factors governing the effective remediation of negative affect and its cognitive and behavioral consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 1040–1053.

Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.

Broadbent, E., Kumar, V., Li, X., Sollers, J., Stafford, R.Q., MacDonald, B.A., & Wegner, D.M. (2013). Robots with display screens: A robot with a more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e72589.

Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

Baumeister, R.F, & Tice, D.M. (1990). Anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 165–195.

Chang, Y., Gao, Y., Zhu, D., & Safeer, A.A. (2023). Social robots: Partner or intruder in the home? The roles of self-construal, social support, and relationship intrusion in consumer preference. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 197, 1–15.

Coeckelbergh, M. (2022). Three responses to anthropomorphism in social robotics: Towards a critical, relational, and hermeneutic approach. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(10), 2049–2061.

Cohen, S., & Wills, T.A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.

DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1991). New institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L.G. Zucker (Ed.), Research on institutional patterns: Environment and culture (pp. 3–22). Ballinger Publishing Co.

Dong, Z., Wang, Z., Xu., J., Tang, R., & Wen, J. (2022). A brief history of recommender systems. Proceedings of ACM Conference, USA. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.01860

Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2008). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2), 143–155.

Esterwood, C., & Robert, L.P. (2021). A systematic review of human and robot personality in health care human-robot interaction. Frontiers in Robotics & AI, (8), 748246–748246.

Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of a housing community. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Gallup Inc. (2022). The State of Social Connections. Washington D.C.

Gelman, S.A., Davidson, N.S., & Umscheid, V.A. (2022). The role of object features and emotional attachment on preschool children’s anthropomorphism of owned objects. Cognitive Development, 62, 101–165.

Giger, J.C., Piçarra, N., Alves‐Oliveira, P., Oliveira, R., & Arriaga, P. (2019). Humanization of robots: Is it really such a good idea? Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 111–123.

Giles, D.C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305.

Gjersoe, N.L., Hall, E.J., & Hood, B. (2015). Children attribute mental lives to toys when they are emotionally attached to them. Cognitive Development, 34, 28–38.

Goetz, J., & Kiesler, S. (2002). Cooperation with a robotic assistant. CHI’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 578–579. USA.

Hauser, S., Redström, J., & Wiltse, H. (2023). The widening rift between aesthetics and ethics in the design of computational things. AI & Society, 38(1), 227–243.

Horton, D., & Wohl, R.R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229.

Hoyle, R.H., & Crawford, A.M. (1994). Use of individual-level data to investigate group phenomena: Issues and strategies. Small Group Research, 25(4), 464–485.

Kahn, P.H., Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N.G., Severson, R.L., Gill, B.T., . . . Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now”: Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303–314.

Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who's the fairest in the land? On the interpretation, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25.

Ki, C., Cho, E., & Lee, J. (2020). Can an intelligent personal assistant (IPA) be your friend? Para-friendship development mechanism between IPAs and their users. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106412.

Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K., Garner, W., Speicher, C., Penn, G.M., Holliday, J., & Glaser, R. (1984). Psychosocial modifiers of immunocompetence in medical students. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46(1), 7–14.

Leary, M.R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 221–229.

Leary, M.R., & Downs, D.L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123–144). New York: Plenum Press.

Lebow, S. (2022, April 7). A not-so-smart rise in smart speaker ownership. Insider Intelligence.

Lee, M., & Park, J.S. (2021). Do parasocial relationships and the quality of communication with AI shopping chatbots determine middle-aged women consumers' continuance usage intentions? Journal of Consumer Behavior, 21(4), 842–854.

Lim, C.M., & Kim, Y.K. (2011). Older consumers’ TV home shopping: Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and perceived convenience. Psychology & Marketing, 28(8), 763–780.

Mathes, E.W., Adams, H.E., & Davies, R.M. (1985). Jealousy: Loss of relationship rewards, loss of self-esteem, depression, anxiety, and anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 552–1561.

McLean, G., Osei-Frimpong, K., & Barhorst, J. (2021). Alexa, do voice assistants influence consumer brand engagement? Examining the role of AI powered voice assistants in influencing consumer brand engagement. Journal of Business Research, 124, 312–328.

McQuail, D., Blumler, J.G., & Brown, J.R. (1972). The television audience: A revised perspective. In McQuail, D. (Ed.), Sociology of mass communications: Selected readings (pp. 135–165). Zarmondsworth: Penguin.

Nahemow, L., & Lawton, M.P. (1975). Similarity and propinquity in friendship formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 205–213.

Novak, T.P., & Hoffman, D.L. (2019). Relationship journeys in the Internet of things: A new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(2), 216–237.

The NPD Group. (2022, June 29). Ownership of smart speakers grew nearly 40% since 2020 in the U.S. Retrieved from https://www.prweb.com/releases/ownership-of-smart-speakers-grew-nearly-40-since-2020-in-the-u-s-reports-npd-871957370.html

Paiva, A., Leite, I., Boukricha, H., &Wachsmuth, I. (2017). Empathy in virtual agents and robots: A survey. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 7(3), 1–40.

Paul, E.S., Moore, A., McAinsh, P., Symonds, E., McCune, S., & Bradshaw, J.W.S. (2014). Sociality motivation and anthropomorphic thinking about pets. Anthrozoös, 27(4), 499–512.

Reis, H.T. (1990). The role of intimacy in interpersonal relations. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 15–30.

Rosengren, K.E., & Windahl, S. (1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Sociology of mass communications: Selected readings (pp. 119–134). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Rzepka, C., & Berger, B. (2018). User interaction with AI-enabled systems: A systematic review of IS research. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems. USA. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2018/general/Presentations/7

Scorici, G., Schultz, M.D., & Seele, P. (2022). Anthropomorphization and beyond: Conceptualizing human washing of AI-enabled machines. AI and Society, 39(2), 789–795.

Seele, P., & Schultz, M.D. (2022). From greenwashing to machine washing: A model and future directions derived from reasoning by analogy. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(4), 1063–1089.

Sundar, S.S., Jung, E.H., Waddell, T.F., & Kim, K.J. (2017). Cheery companions or serious assistants? Role and demeanor congruity as predictors of robot attraction and use intentions among senior citizens. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 97, 88–97.

Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014). When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction. Computer Human Behavior, 38, 75–84.

Tiberius, V., Rietz, M., & Bouncken, R.B. (2020). Performance analysis and science mapping of

institutional entrepreneurship research. Administrative Sciences, 10(3), 1–21.

Weiss, A., van Dijk, B., & Evers, V. (2012). Knowing me knowing you: Exploring effects of culture and context on perception of robot personality. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intercultural Collaboration, pp. 133–136. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, USA.

Wheeler, L., Reis, H.T., & Nezlek, J. (1983). Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 943–953.

Wilder, D.A., & Thompson, J.E. (1980). Intergroup contact with independent manipulations of in-group and out-group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 589–603.

Yam, K.C., Bigman, Y., & Gray, K. (2021). Reducing the uncanny valley by dehumanizing humanoid robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 125(10694), 1–11.

Young, A.D., & Monroe, A.E. (2019). Autonomous morals: Inferences of mind predict acceptance of AI behavior in sacrificial moral dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103870, 1–7.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

Gresock, A., & Leck, K. (2024). Emotional Wellbeing: Understanding the Role of Entrepreneurs in AI-Enabled Machines. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v26i6.7422

Issue

Section

Articles