The Implications of Cross Border Banking and Funding Strategy for Risk and Return

Authors

  • Mohammed Amidu University of Ghana Business School
  • William Coffie University of Ghana Business School
  • Haruna Issahaku University for Development Studies
  • Aisha Mohammed Sissy University of Ghana Business School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v20i4.350

Keywords:

Business, Economics, Finance

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of cross-border banking and funding modes on risk and return. We sample 320 banks across 29 African countries and employ System GMM estimator as a methodological approach to shed further light on the funding sources-stability nexus by examining the complex interaction between three key constructs: cross-border banking, funding strategy, and bank stability and return. We find that though cross border banking increases insolvency risk, it promotes deposit funding which in turn decreases insolvency risk, implying that when banks cross border, they reduce their inherent instability by employing more of less risky deposit funds and less of wholesale and internally generated funds. Our results also suggest that banks that finance their operations with deposit funds are more profitable than those who employ wholesale and internal funds.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-01

How to Cite

Amidu, M., Coffie, W., Issahaku, H., & Sissy, A. M. (2018). The Implications of Cross Border Banking and Funding Strategy for Risk and Return. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v20i4.350

Issue

Section

Articles