Influential Article Review - Competitive Demand Assessment in Companies: A Structural Comparison

Authors

  • Ed Jones
  • Stella Wood
  • Mandy Shaw

Keywords:

Organizational contradictions, Competing demands, Organizational design, Organizational tensions, Paradox theory

Abstract

This paper examines management. We present insights from a highly influential paper. Here are the highlights from this paper: Organizational scholars have shown increasing interest in the ways in which managers enact and respond to competing demands and the tensions they prompt as constitutive elements of their organizations. There is now a proliferation of conceptualizations of such competing demands that can be somewhat confusing. We will enhance conceptual clarity by identifying seven constitutive empirical characteristics of competing demands: these consist of the existence of dyadic relations, contradiction, interrelatedness, complementarity, compatibility, simultaneity, and the existence of push-pull forces. We construct a comparative classification of competing demands using these characteristics as our distinguishing features. The result is a more nuanced understanding of how managers approach competing demands that can help scholars to minimize arbitrariness, interpret results, and compare contributions in the area in a much-needed step toward understanding and designing organizations. For our overseas readers, we then present the insights from this paper in Spanish, French, Portuguese, and German.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-10

How to Cite

Jones, E., Wood, S., & Shaw, M. (2019). Influential Article Review - Competitive Demand Assessment in Companies: A Structural Comparison. American Journal of Management, 19(6). Retrieved from https://mail.articlegateway.com/index.php/AJM/article/view/3279

Issue

Section

Articles